Print Edition RSS RSS Feed
Shopping
Real Estate
Health Care
Automotive
Classifieds
Place an Ad
June 8, 2008
Search Archives



Looking for the PDF Edition?
The PDF of the Print Edition can now be read by clicking the "Print Editon" button at the top of the screen.


New rules force more disclosure of earmarks

WASHINGTON (AP) _ The House and Senate in 2007 implemented reforms aimed at adding transparency to the process of earmarking projects, grants and contracts in legislation.

The House:

- Requires any bill containing earmarks be accompanied by a list identifying each one and the member or members who requested it.

- Requires a letter from the representative who requested an earmark to provide a letter identifying the earmark and the entity to receive the funds, along with a certification that neither the requesting member nor their spouse would benefit financially.

- Prohibits earmarks from being used to influence other members.

The Senate:

- Requires disclosure of earmarks and their sponsors, but it does not require public disclosure of the entities receiving them.

- Prohibits senators from advocating for an earmark in which they might have a financial interest.

Republican proposals not

adopted:

- In Senate, requiring that earmarks be placed in bill language instead of accompanying reports, guaranteeing opponents a chance to vote them down.

- In House, imposing a moratorium on earmarks until a bipartisan committee proposes new reforms.


Click ads below
for larger version